[FEATURE REQ] Save a named preset filter in a selectable list #159
Labels
No labels
Dev Is Brain Dead Sometimes
Information
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
no manners
not planned
pending update
potential bug
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Creepso/tikipeter.github.io#159
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
It seems the only way to isolate movie releases with italian audio is to look for "ita" string in the file name.

Therefore every time in the results list I have to push left key, select FILTER BY TITLE, then insert "ita" and confirm.
It would be much more convenient if, for example, pushing left one time a list of named preset filters (saved from before) would appear, and pushing two times the current list of generic filters would appear.
what if their is a setting in "SORTING AND FILTERING"
that you can add keywords
So you can add the keyword "ita"
(next part is optional
then you assign a number to it (from 1-100) , 100 has highest priority
You can add other keywords too)
Then in RESULTS SORTING instead of QUALITY,SIZE,PROVIDER
you have
KEYWORD(S),QUALITY,SIZE,PROVIDER
Now all terms with ita will place at the top then the rest of the results will display below them
If a result doesn't have ita in it's name, then you'll still see the other results and you don't have to press anything.
this has the benefit that you can also use autoplay knowing you have a good chance it will find an italian language source (if their is one)
Sure, the solution you explained is even better! 😎
In fact I already looked for something like this in the results sorting setting, but of course I found nothing.
Thanks
Why not?
Please don't take this personal are you a developer? I see you respond a lot for Tikipeter I was under the impression he was the developer for his add-on.
I see that @xyzfre replied to a post of which I can't see the original.
Anyways @Tikipeter, I am not disappointed.