[Feature Request] Separate 'Minimum Size' filter for movies and episodes #103

Closed
opened 2024-08-26 07:49:45 +00:00 by OfficerKD637 · 5 comments
OfficerKD637 commented 2024-08-26 07:49:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Hi Peter,

Hope you've been doing well!

I was wondering if you could bifurcate the 'Minimum Size' filter into movies and episodes? I am currently trying to create a sweet spot for autoplay with the maximum and minimum size filters, but a minimum size for a movie (eg. 30 GB) won't make sense for an episode (which tends to be in the 5 - 8 GB range on average).

Let me know what you think.

Hi Peter, Hope you've been doing well! I was wondering if you could bifurcate the 'Minimum Size' filter into movies and episodes? I am currently trying to create a sweet spot for autoplay with the maximum and minimum size filters, but a minimum size for a movie (eg. 30 GB) won't make sense for an episode (which tends to be in the 5 - 8 GB range on average). Let me know what you think.
Tikipeter commented 2024-08-29 05:12:56 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

OK.

OK.
OfficerKD637 commented 2024-08-29 06:11:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Thank you so much Peter, I really appreciate it!

I just read the new rules about submitting Feature Requests.

Apart from this current feature request (status: pending update), I also have 2 other open requests.
One of which you have already self-assigned and said you'd look into (since it's quite tedious to implement). Do I need to delete the other one? I posted those about a week ago but I'm happy to comply with the new rules.

And I'll make sure to follow these going forward.

Thank you!

Thank you so much Peter, I really appreciate it! I just read the new rules about submitting Feature Requests. Apart from this current feature request (status: pending update), I also have 2 other open requests. One of which you have already self-assigned and said you'd look into (since it's quite tedious to implement). Do I need to delete the other one? I posted those about a week ago but I'm happy to comply with the new rules. And I'll make sure to follow these going forward. Thank you!
Tikipeter commented 2024-08-29 08:14:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

No need. The rules are just for moving forward. There's a couple of you with multiple requests currently which are fine.

I just need to limit them a little, as lots of open issues tickles my anxiety for some reason.

No need. The rules are just for moving forward. There's a couple of you with multiple requests currently which are fine. I just need to limit them a little, as lots of open issues tickles my anxiety for some reason.
OfficerKD637 commented 2024-08-30 06:30:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Haha I get it! The last thing I'd want is to tickle you the wrong way lol.
If I may... the ostrich algorithm is something worth looking into when you're trying to resolve future bugs/issues.

Haha I get it! The last thing I'd want is to tickle you the wrong way lol. If I may... the [ostrich algorithm](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrich_algorithm) is something worth looking into when you're trying to resolve future bugs/issues.
Tikipeter commented 2024-09-05 23:32:55 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Done for next update.

Done for next update.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.